Tag Archives: law

We Shall Have No King Above The Law

king_obama1Before there was a United States of America there was belief in the rights of the individual and the source from which these rights were derived.  It was Thomas Jefferson that so eloquently and succinctly wrote our Declaration of Independence and penned the phrase, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator.”

Within those words is the understanding that no person in this land shall be above the law, indeed we shall have no king.  The power of government as later defined in our Constitution shall be found within the common man, in the power of his vote.  The authority and power of government shall come from the people and be granted to representatives of the people.

Recognizing the frailties and imperfections of mankind our founding fathers divided our government into three separate and equal branches of government providing a balance of power to check limitations on each other.  We shall have no king and no one shall be above the law.

Hence it is troubling and quite frankly dangerous when any branch of government acts beyond their limitations.  More importantly, when it occurs and is left unchecked it becomes an assault and erosion to the very basic concepts upon which our nation was founded.  When the transgression derives from the executive branch we move toward the powers of a king and the elevation of a President above the law.

Words have meanings, and our code of law is clear in most regards.  When questions of law arise we have a system and authority within the judicial branch of government to act as interpreter and enforcer.

By law the President of the United States must send the United States Congress a budget by the first Monday in February.  That will not happen this year.  Once again our President has notified Congress he will not comply with the law.  This is not unusual for this President he has done it before.

President Obama has missed the budget deadline more than any president since the 1920s. His first budget was delayed until May, and the last two budgets were late but came in February.  The annual budget is intended to start a congressional budget process, but under the Obama administration we have not seen a budget resolution passed since 2009.  Hence we now have no useable baseline from past approved budgets.

If the President’s budget is delayed the Congress is denied an understanding of spending and possible budget cuts being proposed by the President.  This is unacceptable at a time when our nation faces a financial crisis as we edge toward exceeding our national debt ceiling.  Our President is playing politics while compounding our problems, and breaking the law.  The President may want to avoid delivering his budget for political purposes but he is harming our financial future and acting above the law.  Barack Obama is President he is not a king.

The failure of any President to act in his execution of the duties of the office should not be a partisan issue it should be the duty of every member of Congress to demand and ensure our President acts within the law.  Every member of Congress is an elected representative of the people and not a pawn of a king.  It is the responsibility for every Senator and Congressman to put aside political affiliations, personal bias and career considerations to ensure compliance with the rule of law.  We shall have no king.

Leave a Comment

Filed under NATIONAL ISSUES, POLITICS

WikiLeaks and the Coventry Town Council What’s the Connection?

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has really stirred the pot in diplomatic circles with the release of sensitive documents previously held in confidence.  The world is reading details from diplomatic correspondence that the inner circles of power never thought would see the light of day.

Today the Hartford Courant is questioning if Mr. Assange should be hailed as a hero or prosecuted for leaking sensitive U. S. documents.  Why that is even a question should be disturbing, unfortunately it is not.  Unfortunately we have lowered some of our ethical standards upon which this nation was founded.  From Coventry to Washington there is a lack of courage in government and selective enforcement is a prime example.

We have leaders that will pass a regulation or law telling the voters it was needed, then brag they are working hard or even fighting “for the people”.  The lack of courage is reflected in the policy of enforcement for the regulation or law.  If the issue was so important that a regulation or law was required to control the activity why then do we see the concept of selective enforcement?

On a national level why are we asking if Julian Assange should be prosecuted, the only question should be did he break the law?  Why does our local Town Council have regulations on the books for blight or sign control then have a policy of selective enforcement?  Their enforcement policy is to have staff ignore an obvious violation unless a citizen actually complains.

It’s a good thing Liz Woolf is Chairman of the Town Council and not the Chief of Police.  Can you imagine with an enforcement policy like that, stop signs and red lights would be meaningless until a citizen stopped at the police department to fill out a form to complain?  Yes, a driver running a red light at 90 miles an hour on route 44 would be just fine as long as nobody came forward with a written complaint.

Selective prosecution or enforcement is not new and it occurs at all levels.  One need only remember back a few years to the Clinton presidency.  The President of the United States lied to a grand jury then selective prosecution became a topic of the day.  The defenders of Mr. Clinton did not deny the act occurred but rather said it was insignificant and Mr. Clinton should not be prosecuted.  Every presidency has a legacy and Mr. Clinton will have selective enforcement as part of his.  That doesn’t make it right.

Selective enforcement is poor government policy for regulations or laws.  If we need the actions of government in the form of regulation or law then it should be enforced.  If the policy of enforcement is selective it could well be that the regulation is poorly written or not really needed, in either case review for possible removal from the books would be proper.

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under COVENTRY EDUCATION

GETTING OLDER JUST GOT BETTER IN CONNECTICUT

Governor Rell recently signed into law Public Act No. 10-53 giving all drivers over sixty (60) an opportunity to save on their individual automobile insurance policy.  The law will go into effect on October 1, 2010 and will provide older drivers the option of completing a four-hour accident prevention course and becoming eligible for a discount on their automobile insurance policy.

The minimum discount shall be at least five (5) percent and may be more depending on your carrier.  The discount shall apply to the premium charges for the automobile for at least twenty-four (24) months.

The bill had wide support in the legislature including our local elected officials Representative Joan Lewis and Senator Tony Guglielmo.  We can thank them both for their attention to this issue and hope they will now move on to cost cutting for our state budget.

Approval of the new course will be handled by the Motor Vehicle Department and it is anticipated they will be available from a variety of sources.

Leave a Comment

Filed under CONNECTICUT ISSUES